Great Streets Natural Bridge Community Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464368386
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3145164261
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$13,116
Assets
$132,580
Liabilities
$171,134

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTIN SOBOLIK (DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER SPILLING (DIRECTOR / VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KRISTIN SOBOLIK (DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER SPILLING (DIRECTOR / VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JANET WILDING (DIRECTOR / SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Reducing neighborhood tensions by combating community deterioration, and lessening the burdens of government by undertaking and supporting charitable redevelopment activities in the area and region. The corporation will work closely with the city of normandy, Missouri; st. Louis county; the university of Missouri - st. Louis; the Missouri department of transportation; and other entities to conduct charitable economic redevelopment activities along the natural bridge road corridor and throughout the university square area (specifically east from i-170 and south of i-70, east to lucas and hunt road and north of st. Charles rock road) and the region. Furthermore, the corporation will conduct other charitable community programs to help accomplish its purposes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Reducing neighborhood tensions by combating community deterioration, and lessening the burdens of government by undertaking and supporting charitable redevelopment activities within the university square area (specifically east from i-170 and south of i-70, east to lucas and hunt road and north of st. Charles rock road) and the region.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 34

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.11; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.29; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.