Great Spirit Animal Sanctuary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821095343
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Snowflake, AZ, USA
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,902
- Expenses
- $134,205
- Assets
- $124,126
- Liabilities
- $111,926
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Ziebell (President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Ziebell (President)
- Darlene Ziebell (PR Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Great Spirit Animal Sanctuary is a organization that provides a permanent home for animals in danger of being euthanized. Animal Rescue. GSAS provides them with a safe home. Providing feed medical and care for life
What it reported doing in 2023
Feral Cat trapping program. Trapping feral cats and providing them a safe home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.1%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 6%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -70.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 42.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.1% of revenue deployed · 6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.