Great River Passage Conservancy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832828394
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512125176
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $273,059
- Expenses
- $349,468
- Assets
- $24,017
- Liabilities
- $1,439
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jodi Massey (Interim Executive Director from Jan 2025)
- Katie Nyberg (Executive Director through Jan 2025)
Highest reported compensation
- Jodi Massey (Interim Executive Director from Jan 2025): $120,941 total reported compensation
- Katie Nyberg (Executive Director through Jan 2025): $15,714 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Working in partnership with the City of Saint Paul's Great River Passage Initiative, the Great River Passage Conservancy leads advocacy and private fundraising efforts for capital projects and programs along Saint Paul's 17 miles of the Mississippi River. By advancing major projects along the Mississippi River and supporting unique programming opportunities that allow people to experience the river in new ways, Great River Passage Conservancy fosters environmental stewardship, community health and economic development. Our mission is to raise resources that support the community's vision for connecting Saint Paul's two greatest assets: Its people and the Mississippi River.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization continued its mission to strengthen connections between Saint Paul and the Mississippi River through projects, programs, and partnerships. In addition, the GRPC board embarked on a strategic planning process that resulted in the decision to merge with another non-profit, Saint Paul Parks Conservancy, effective January 1, 2026. The GRPC portfolio of work, staff, and assets was transferred into the organization at the end of 2025. RIVER LEARNING CENTER (Class 205 RLC): GRPC staff worked in partnership with the City of Saint Paul, the Architecture firm VJAA, landscape architects TEN x TEN, and Full Circle Indigenous Planning + Design to advance the design process for the Mississippi River Learning Center. GPRC staff supported the city and design team's efforts around community engagement, communications, and piloting events to activate the site and explore future programming opportunities. Part of the process is helping partners learn to work together on-site. We planned events and convened partners around activities to test and learn, such as Winter Play Day. This brought together partners including the National Park Service, Mississippi Park Connection, Wakan Tipi, Urban Bird Collective, USDA Forest Service, Wilderness Inquiry, Native Fish for Tomorrow, and more. More than 400 people attended. The group determined it was a worthwhile event and worth repeating in winter 2026. A major accomplishment of the merger is the decision that SPPC will be the partner responsible for fundraising for this project. This was a major outstanding question that was resolved. RIVER BALCONY (Class 210 RB): We are leading the effort to unite downtown partners around the Saint Paul Riverfront vision, aligning projects such as the River Balcony and RiversEdge to guide development, funding, and programming. Working in partnership with the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, and downtown stakeholders like the Science Museum of Minnesota, MN Wild, and Downtown Alliance, we are advancing a cohesive vision for the downtown riverfront. One of the first steps is to launch the Downtown Riverwalk, a pedestrian loop connecting downtown Saint Paul to the Mississippi Riverfront. The two-mile loop will feature interpretive locations focusing on a range of subjects, including cultural history, geology, river commerce, and ecology. With support from Knight Foundation, we were able to: 1) Develop Downtown Riverwalk branding. 2) Convene partners to collaborate and build support, including the Science Museum of Minnesota, Wakan Tipi, District Energy, the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, the Downtown Alliance, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Railroad, Public Art Saint Paul, Seitu Jones Studio, Minnesota Museum of American Art (The M), and others. 3) Hire a historian and interpretive planner to research and propose stories for trail signage, and a graphic designer to design the panels. (Trail signage will be installed in Spring 2026.) 4) Produce original audio plays in partnership with Wonderlust Productions. Each trail sign will feature a unique QR code linking listeners to creative stories inspired by the history of that location. 5) Design and install vibrant wayfinding signage on more than 70 lampposts. 6) Convene artists and arts organizations to explore ways to bring vibrancy to dark and uninviting spaces along the loop. A central feature of the Riverwalk will be a reimagining of the railroad underpasses at Sibley and Jackson streets. Today, these passageways are dark, uninviting, and often perceived as unsafe, deterring pedestrians and cyclists from accessing the riverfront. To turn the underpasses into vibrant, welcoming gateways to the Mississippi River, we are transforming these spaces through public art installations. Partnerships were formed, and design concepts began in collaboration with Public Arts Saint Paul, Wakpa Triennial Art Festival, Seitu Jones Studio, and The Museum of American Art. Installation will begin fall of 2026. As these lar
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $266K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.