Great Promise Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454371255
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Decatur, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4046940328
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,515
- Expenses
- $189,145
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Ann Cramer (Director)
- Simon Bloom (Director)
- Steve Hollis (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Great Promise Partnership is an educational organization whose purpose is to raise the High School graduation rates for at-risk students while preparing them for higher education and the world of work. OUR PURPOSE 1) To decrease the high school drop-out rate in the state of Georgia 2) To provide students at-risk of dropping out of high school with the tools they need to graduate high school and enter college, a career, or the military 3) To cultivate a more skilled and robust workforce in the state of Georgia
What it reported doing in 2024
Great Promise Partnership, Inc. is working with 34 communities across the state of Georgia in various stages of implementation. 1000s of students ready to work through GPP programing and statewide partners such as Communities In Schools, Department of Defense and Department of Labor. 2015 - 2023 Results 89 per cent OF SENIORS GRADUATED 79 per cent Pursuing Post-Secondary Education 7 percent Entering the Military 11 per cent Entering the Workforce 0 DROPOUT RATE All underclassmen remain in school, moving closer to graduation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -88.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -78.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -39.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -59.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.