Great Plains of Kiowa Co Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481226833
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3166851523
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,050,366
- Expenses
- $9,757,450
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVE DELLASEGA (PRESIDENT/CEO/SECRETARY)
- JOHN TERRILL (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- NIZAR KIBAR (PHYSICIAN): $445,921 total reported compensation
- RICHARD MEADOR (PHYSICIAN): $354,457 total reported compensation
- KELSEY HOTT (PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT): $266,760 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate hospital facilities for the delivery of hospital and related health care services, health related education, as well as the promotion of health and wellness, without regard to race, creed, color, sex or financial circumstance.
What it reported doing in 2020
Kiowa County Memorial Hospital has the mission and primary function to deliver quality, compassionate health care to the population that we serve. When we cannot meet their needs - ie: cardiac, surgical, intensive care, OB needs, etc., we facilitate their entry into a health system that will meet those needs. Kiowa County Memorial Hospital manages the local county ambulance service via contract, to ensure that medical transfer is always available. To further their care, we also have a specialty clinic area, where specialists come to offer consulting and follow-up care. SEE SCHEDULE O FOR CONTINUATION.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 76.3%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 76.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $446K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.