Great Council of Pennsylvania Improved Order of Red Men Wambic Tribe 507

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232119609
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Everett, PA, USA
Phone
8146529533
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,378
Expenses
$5,812
Assets
$9,093
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ALLEN FEATHERS (TRUSTEE)
  • PAUL GREG SHAFFER (TRUSTEE)
  • KEVIN CLARK (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote the improved order of red men and its belief of love and respect for the american flag, preserve our nation by defending and upholding the principle of free government, america and the democratic way of life, preserving the traditions and history of this great country, creating and inspiring a greater love for the united states of america, helping our fellow man through organized charitable programs, linking our members together in a common bond of brotherhood and friendship and perpetuating the beautiful lengends and traditions of a once-vanishing race and the keeping alive some of the traditional customs, ceremonies, and philosophies.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promote awareness of the order, hold ceremonies and recognition meetings and participate in national and state meetings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 30

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -72.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 30.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.