Grazia Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873321225
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Phone
4349873671
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,426
Expenses
$99,215
Assets
$26,919

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTINE BOWERS (PRESIDENT &)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTINE BOWERS (PRESIDENT &)
  • LOUISE GOODLING (TREAS/DIR AN)
  • JEAN CASE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the grazia foundation is to help children and their families heal, learn, and grow through the power of the human-animal connection. Our belief is that animals and nature are healing. We provide equine assisted psychotherapy in an idyllic natural setting to support our mission of healing and growth. We also aim to provide camps, workshops, and other learning opportunities and experiences both at the farm and in the community to foster connection with animals and promote the benefits of nature and the human-animal connection.

What it reported doing in 2025

Equine assisted psychotherapy in an idyllic natural setting, supporting our mission of healing and growth. This was provided through camps, workshops, and other learning opportunities and experiences to foster connection with animals and promote the benefits of nature and the human-animal connection.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.