Grayson County Hospital Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
610523298
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Leitchfield, KY, USA
Phone
2702593159
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$808,613
Expenses
$3,138,806
Assets
$938,758
Liabilities
$619,549

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TREVOR RAY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID DOWNS (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • DENNIS FENTRESS (DIRECTOR)
  • EDWIN MCKINNEY (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide quality medical healthcare to the grayson county, Kentucky area.

What it reported doing in 2025

Twin lakes regional medical center provides quality medical health care services to patients regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or the ability to pay. Although reimbursement for services rendered is critical to the operation and financial stability of twin lakes regional medical center, it is recognized that not all individuals possess the ability to purchase essential medical services. In keeping with our commitment to serve all members of this area, the hospital provides free care to the most indigent of patients and writes off portions of bills to other patients who have demonstrated the inability to pay for all health care services received. A letter of intent was signed on april 13, 2020 to transfer the operating assets of the grayson county hospital foundation, inc. (the "hospital") and the twin lakes medical foundation, inc. To owensboro health, inc., a not for profit health system. The transaction was finalized and became effective january 1, 2021. Under the terms of the agreement, a portion of the proceeds were used to satisfy the outstanding bonds issued by the grayson county public hospital district corporation (the "corporation"). Upon the defeasance of the bonds, the land and facilities owned by the corporation were transferred to a new corporation formed by owensboro health, owensboro health twin lakes regional medical center, inc., to operate the hospital. The net proceeds from the transaction and retained assets were transferred to the grayson county healthcare foundation, inc., a new not for profit corporation formed to provide grants and support healthcare in the county. After current obligations are fulfilled, it is management's intent to dissolve this entity; however, the time frame for the dissolution is uncertain at this time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -288.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.66; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.