Graves County High School Eagle Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452517362
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Mayfield, KY, USA
Phone
2703286242
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$36,410
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • COLLIN FITZGERALD (Vice President)
  • JARROD THOMPSON (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • RICKY BINKLEY (Director)
  • TYLER GOODMAN (Secretary)
  • TOMMY DUBLIN (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the graves county high school eagle foundation is to serve as an advocate for facility development and the educational, athletic, and student activities at graves county high school. We seek to celebrate student and athletic achievement, to enhance alumni involvement, to promote wellness among students and our community, and to inspire philanthropic contributions from individuals, corporations, and foundations.

What it reported doing in 2019

The graves county high school eagle foundation, inc. Will raise funds to construct facilities that will benefit graves county high school, the graves county school district and in turn, the individual students, faculty and administration in the district. These facilities are also intended to include health and wellness centers which will benefit all graves county residents. The funds raised by the foundation will be turned over to the graves county board of education for them to administer the planned projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -31.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.