Grass Lake Senior Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834617904
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Grass Lake, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5175228466
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $136,804
- Expenses
- $105,525
- Assets
- $150,186
- Liabilities
- $4,877
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT SMITH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANNA LAVERGNE (DIRECTOR)
- SCOTT SMITH (PRESIDENT)
- VIOLET ARNETT (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To have a positive impact on the health and well-being of older adults in the community by providing opportunities for social connections, physical activity and lifelong learning.
What it reported doing in 2025
To have a positive impact on the health and well-being of older adults in the community by providing social opportunities and lifelong learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.