Graphic Communications International Union Local 24 - Education & Training
Legal name: Graphic Communications Int'l Union Local 24 - Education & Training
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237243677
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123911377
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,122
- Expenses
- $2,521
- Assets
- $13,710
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER LANG III (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HARRY WULFF (EMPLOYER TRUSTEE)
- WILLIAM JOHNSON (EMPLOYER TRUSTEE)
- DANIEL SCHWAB (UNION TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the graphic communications int'l union local 24 education and training fund is to provide education and training for lithographic and photoengraving employees.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provide apprenticeships and training to lithographic and photoengraving employees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.44; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -45.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.