Presbyterian Homes & Services
Legal name: Grandview Christian Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410844893
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roseville, MN, USA
- Phone
- 651-631-6100
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,193,604
- Expenses
- $23,469,053
- Assets
- $56,525,556
- Liabilities
- $58,440,367
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAN LINDH (BOARD CHAIR/CEO)
- JONATHAN FLETCHER (BOARD CHAIR/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAN LINDH (BOARD CHAIR/CEO): $1,023,333 total reported compensation
- MARK MEYER (SEC/TREAS/CFO): $528,586 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN FLETCHER (BOARD CHAIR/CEO): $428,022 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To honor God by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults. Serving older adults is our passion. Presbyterian Homes & Services made the decision to incorporate an in-house project development team that would serve both PHS and other organizations serving older adults. Senior Housing Partners (SHP) was formed to guide Presbyterian Homes in the pursuit of expanding our mission to more older adults in years to come. Shepherd of The Lake Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church joined with PHS to build and open McKenna Crossing in Prior Lake, Minn. Both the church building and McKenna Crossing are part of the Shepherd’s Path campus. The congregation now supplies chaplaincy services to McKenna Crossing and many of the residents living there maintain ties to t.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization operates a 110 bed skilled nursing facility in cambridge, Minnesota for the elderly.the campus also has 40 independent senior townhomes, 50 independent apartments, 60 assisted living apartments and 18 memory care specific assisted living apartments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $839K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.