Grande Ronde Hospital Auxiliary Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237090684
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
La Grande, OR, USA
Phone
5419638421
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,875
Expenses
$1,043
Assets
$75,039
Liabilities
$9,464

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRED MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FRED MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • GARNET SHAW (VICE PRESIDE)
  • VIRGINIA LACKEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the auxiliary is to assist the hospital and the administration in providing voluntary aid for the welfare of the patients, public relations through service to the hospital, and fundraising through methods approved by the board of trustees of grande ronde hospital through the auxiliary liaison.

What it reported doing in 2024

The auxiliary provides voluntary aid for patients, visitors and hospital administration. It also raises funds to donate to the hospital for patient care equipment. The auxiliary contributed 75 during the year for hospital equipment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 7

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 94.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 71.95; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 7.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.