Grand Rapids Lgbtq Healthcare Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 861255256
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2024–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Rating: 36
Verdict: REVIEW
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Lesbian, Gay Rights

Reported finances

Revenue: $102,941
Expenses: $108,835
Assets: $46,799

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Jennie Knight (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

Jennie Knight (Executive Director)
Doug Booth (Vice Chair)
Grace Huizinga (Officer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Grand Rapids LGBTQ+ Healthcare Consortium exists to make healthcare in West Michigan safer more affirming and more accessible for LGBTQ+ people by educating providers supporting the community and reducing health disparities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Thanks to a grant we established a dedicated webpage on our site to address food security issues. This resource actively maintained with the support of the GVSU Food Nutrition Program serves as a valuable information hub. The initiative was prompted by a Kent County assessment highlighting the communitys challenges with affordable and nutritious food access.

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 5
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 21
Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 4.9%; rating input score 5
Program expense ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 27%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: Limited
Asset growth: Limited

Details

Where the money goes: 4.9% of revenue deployed · 4.6% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.