Grand Prairie Wellness Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752877107
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Grand Prairie, TX, USA
Phone
9722669123
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Reported finances

Revenue
$324,293
Expenses
$338,202
Assets
$237,760
Liabilities
$7,649

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TENCHA RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHUCK POFFENBARGER (PRESIDENT)
  • MARI BRIGGS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TENCHA RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $47,630 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to provide health care and health-related education to low income families unable to access mainstream health care. Located in the north-east sector of grand prairie, the wellness center operates within a federally designated medically under-served area. Our patients include residents from both dallas and tarrant counties, and patients typically reside in 75050 zip code.

What it reported doing in 2013

A third category of provided services is health screenings, which are given at the facility throughout the month, and at a health fair, also at our facility, on the last saturday of the month. Additionally, we sponsor and/or participate in health fairs offered at different locations throughout the community. Screenings/health management services include mammography, blood pressure, diabetes, cholesterol, hearing, vision and bmi analysis. In 2013, screening/health management services were provided to 2,080 children and adults. At retail, and including the value of services donated to the organization, these services would be valued at $77,202. Per patient, the average value of services provided was $37.12.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $61.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.2% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $240K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.