Grand Performances

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954576761
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
2136872190
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,874,693
Expenses
$2,117,091
Assets
$1,983,855
Liabilities
$147,882

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAFAEL GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RAFAEL GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $158,335 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Grand performances' mission is to inspire community, celebrate diversity, and unite los angeles through free access to global performing arts.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, grand performances (gp) expanded year-round programming, deepened community partnerships, and strengthened its operational systems in preparation for its 40th anniversary in 2026. The organization's key accomplishments in 2024 include: programming and attendance:- presented 30+ live performances and community events across music, poetry, dance, and film.- welcomed over 25,000 in-person attendees to California plaza, a 200% increase from pre-pandemic levels.- expanded programming into spring and fall seasons, beyond gp's traditional summer series.- curated new formats including classical and poetry showcases, on-site culinary experiences, and interactive cultural conversations.community engagement:- partnered with pauly's project and hello stranger for a community sock and underwear drive supporting unhoused neighbors.- collaborated with omni hotel los angeles to introduce culturally themed on-site dining reflecting the artists' backgrounds.- continued partnerships with chirla, ed trust west, aarp, kcrw and others to extend gp's reach across los angeles county.- strengthened relationships with local artists, youth performers, and vendors, emphasizing paid opportunities and mentorship.workforce and vendor village:- expanded the vendor village to showcase 25+ local small businesses and community entrepreneurs.- provided paid youth workforce opportunities in production, marketing, and front-of-house operations.- offered professional development sessions for interns through the la county arts internship program and gp's own youth workforce initiative.artistic innovation:- introduced thematic programming connecting food, music, and storytelling across global traditions.- featured multidisciplinary events such as broadway night lights, grand avenue arts: all access, and late night train of thought with metro art and zcalo.- continued emphasis on cross-cultural programming positioning los angeles as both local and global.fund development and operations- diversified funding through renewed multi-year grants and new foundation partnerships.- maintained balanced financial operations with increased earned revenue from membership and vendor participation.- strengthened governance and compliance systems in preparation for gp's 40th anniversary strategic framework (20252026).looking aheadgrand performances enters 2025 with a clear focus on:- expanding regional programming in partnership with los angeles county cultural hubs;- strengthening its youth and workforce development pipeline; and- launching the "gp 40th anniversary" planning initiative to celebrate four decades of free, world-class performing arts for all.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $158K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.