Granbury Pee Wee Football Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455468734
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Granbury, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2142872817
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,461
- Expenses
- $55,551
- Assets
- $32,444
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARREN RICE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DARREN RICE (PRESIDENT)
- ROSS HAGER (VICE PRESIDE)
- SHELLIE WAGNON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Gpwfa is dedicated to the growth and development of youth football players prek to 6th grade. Our mission is two-fold: to develop the fundamentals of football and encourage participation in team sports. In addition, we are supportive of football being a means of staying active, as well as having fun. The goals of the program are to develop a sense of achievement, leadership skills, and a positive self-image for all participants. We will accomplish these goals by encouraging positive attitudes, healthy lifestyles, work ethic, discipline, and perseverance. We believe that in developing those traits, our young children will not only be successful athletically, but throughout all aspects of their lives.
What it reported doing in 2021
Pee wee football
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.3% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.