Grammy's House Artesia Domestic Violence Shelter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850419014
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Artesia, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5757481198
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $585,072
- Expenses
- $680,325
- Assets
- $1,950,933
- Liabilities
- $18,248
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CELINA BRYANT (EXECUTIVE DI): $103,057 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The stated mission of grammy's house is to liberate all families from fear and violence. Grammy's house seeks to provide a safe environment, assisting in the advocacy, education, and empowerment of victims and child-witness victims of domestic violence. Grammy's house strives to educate the community at large about the effects of domestic violence on adults and children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grammys house accomplishments for 2025 internal staffing grammys house filled several positions which were vacant during the previous year. First, we filled the receptionist position with a bi-lingual skilled employee with fifteen years of public managerial experience. Second, we filled the domestic violence offender treatment intervention facilitator position with another skilled bi-lingual individual with several years of public service include working in corrections. Last, at the present, grammys house is fully staffed and there are currently no vacant positions. This is huge accomplishment for grammys house as we did struggle to fill one evening and one weekend position. Funding and fundraising another accomplishment is that grammys house received an increase in funding from three long-term funders. This was an incredibly positive gain and really helped us increase our budget. Additionally, we also received an increase in overall non-restricted donations. This year, our board of directors conducted a fund raiser within our community. They successfully raised close to 37,000.00 for grammys house operations. Client successes grammys house assisted a total of 163 victims of domestic violence with counseling, shelter, orders of protection, on-site crisis intervention, nutrition, daily care packages, clothing, transportation, and pet kennels for the clients fur baby survivors. Grammys house helped a total of eighteen (18) families with their transition to permanent housing. The assistance involved help with non-refundable deposits, food, cleaning supplies, furniture, and advocacy for after-care support. Donations from community grammys house was the recipient of two wonderful donation drives. The federal law enforcement training center border patrol agents hosted a school supply drive for our agency. The supplies donated were in abundance and we were able to help over fifty-six families with their school supply needs. Our local yucca elementary school fifth graders hosted a nonperishable food drive for grammys house. Megan miller, teacher, spearheaded this food drive as a contest (fifth graders)for a pizza party for whoever brought in the most food. Grammys house received an abundance of non-perishable food which afforded us an opportunity to share with the community at large (other organizations). Community outreach domestic violence awareness month grammys house dv trainers took part in the 2025 artesia junior high school health and wellness day on october 16, 2025. The focus of health and wellness day was for the whole school, park junior high school, to come together and focus on what it means to be healthy. Through fun, interactive presentations and hands-on activities, students and staff discovered practical ways to take care of their body, mind, and relationshipswhile building connections with each other and our community. We presented material on domestic violence awareness, teen-dating, bullying, and safety to 523 students throughout the entire day.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.87; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $550K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.