Graettinger Community Visioning

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842268822
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Graettinger, IA, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,837
Expenses
$17,329
Assets
$125,663
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Megan Helmich (President)
  • Lynn Park (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Megan Helmich (President)
  • Lynn Park (Vice President)
  • Brooke Girres (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Graettinger Community Visioning focuses on community betterment activities and projects within the City of Graettinger Iowa which provides opportunities to collaborate and partner within the community encourage economic growth and development of the community and improve the quality of life for its citizens by building a sustainable community for the good of future generations It is an all-volunteer organization that works closely with the City of Graettinger to carry out its primary activities of walkingbiking trails development city park enhancements community events and other visual improvements to the City of Graettinger

What it reported doing in 2024

Community EventsTrails - Held a 15 mile walk on our trails that were lit with LED lights throughout 225 community members attended

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.1%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 84.4%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.25; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 51.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 58.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.1% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.