Grace Therapeutic Horse Program
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800877178
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Battle Ground, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3609107101
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,791
- Expenses
- $69,206
- Assets
- $22,899
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBIN NELSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBIN NELSON (PRESIDENT)
- LIZ GULKER (SECRETARY)
- DIANE BRAXMEYER (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Grace therapeutic horse program works to enrich the lives of our participants through a collaborative equine assisted program. We utilize the natural bond between horses and humans to foster emotional growth and healing, and to promote responsibility and integrity with our youth as they interact with their horses. We integrate equine-facilitated learning which helps improve cognitive functioning such as organizing behavior and strategizing to accomplish goals, while building resilience and strength.
What it reported doing in 2024
Serving kids/youth directly, and partnering with clark county agencies to serve their clients with the organization's therapeutic horse program. Our focus is on kids suffering from trauma and abuse.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $63K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.