Grace Hospice of Arizona Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264673334
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Phone
9187243065
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Reported finances

Revenue
$906
Expenses
$6,391
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWIN GUNGOR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EDWIN GUNGOR (PRESIDENT)
  • GAIL GUNGOR (SECRETARY)
  • ROGER A BRUHN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We supply world-class care for terminally ill patients regardless of their ability to pay. We devote a percentage of our revenues to socially responsible programs. We also form strategic alliances with business partners and private foundations in order to fund worthwhile causes.

What it reported doing in 2018

Our team of doctors, nurses, social workers, dieticians and therapists at grace hospice serves our patients, our families, and our community with a total commitment to excellence in hospice care. When curative treatment for a life-limiting illness is no longer an option, hospice care can help address the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the patient and family. We walk together with those we serve to provide comfort and peace, while preserving dignity and quality of life. We do so regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 57.6%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -605.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -182% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 57.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.