Gorlin Syndrome Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341915691
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
2676896443
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specifically Named Diseases

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$489,524
Expenses
$430,424
Assets
$670,207
Liabilities
$275,536

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAYLOR HODGE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN GULLATT (PRESIDENT STARTING IN MARCH)
  • JULIA BRENEISER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MEREDITH WEISS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIA BRENEISER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $92,129 total reported compensation
  • MEREDITH WEISS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $41,136 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To thoughtfully support, comprehensively educate, and aggressively seek the best treatments and a cure for those affected by gorlin syndrome.

What it reported doing in 2024

The gorlin syndrome alliance (gsa) advances its mission through targeted program services designed to support patients and their families, while coalescing the broader community, including patients, scientists and clinicians, around priorities that improve how patients live with the disease now, and in the future.research grant programin 2024, the gsa organized, managed, and funded the only research grant program for gorlin syndrome, dedicated to improving quality of life for patients and families affected. Through targeted investment in scientific learnings and innovation, this program accelerates discoveries in the field. Our objective is to focus researchers' efforts on the questions that will illuminate root mechanisms of disease, and improve clinical outcomes on measures that matter to patients. In 2024, the gsa received more than double the number of research proposal applications from the year prior. The grant review committee selected the proposal "defining the bcc microenvironment change in response to smoothened inhibition: identification of a role for addition of checkpoint inhibitor to optimize antitumor therapy for overwhelming disease".patient registry data collectionthe gsa maintained a gorlin syndrome patient registry, which enrolls patients and collects anonymized health histories from participants for the purpose of centralizing data about gorlin syndrome. The data will drive discoveries. The gsa enrolled new participants during 2024, with the objective of growing the registry participation year on year.educational resourcesthe gsa provided free, publicly available educational resources, including patient focused educational materials, webinars, and expert presentations. These materials are made available at no cost to individuals across the us through our website and youtube channel.community and patient support servicesthe gsa facilitated 12 virtual support group meetings, 4 town hall meetings, and ad hoc in-person gatherings for patients and families. Telephonic support and assistance was provided throughout the year, with staff and volunteers responding to 119 incoming telephone calls and countless emails from patients, families, or clinicians. Information dissemination and communicationsthrough its communications strategy, the gsa distributed (12) monthly e-newsletters, with additional, targeted research updates. Information included emerging therapies, clinical trial opportunities, and patient support services. Through volunteers and staff, the gsa also made hundreds of calls to community members to ensure critical information was shared. In addition, research and grant opportunity announcements were circulated to clinicians and scientists in the gsa network.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 64.9%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58% of revenue deployed · 64.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $279K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.