Goodwill of North Georgia Development Company Ii Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851936726
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Decatur, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4044209900
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,500
- Expenses
- $603,910
- Assets
- $10,310,004
- Liabilities
- $11,884,921
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEITH PARKER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KEITH PARKER (PRESIDENT): $1,189,436 total reported compensation
- TIMOTHY O'CONNELL (TREASURER): $364,905 total reported compensation
- MARIANGELA CORALES (SECRETARY): $322,640 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Supporting organization that is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes, and/or activities of goodwill of north Georgia (gng). Specifically to develop and hold real estate for gng.
What it reported doing in 2024
The company, in an effort to enable its supported public charitable organization, goodwill of north Georgia, inc., a Georgia nonprofit corporation (goodwill), to better accomplish its charitable mission of enhancing the dignity and quality of life of individuals, families, and communiites by eliminating barriers to opportunity and helping people in need reach their full potential through the power of work constructed, renovated, and installed certain improvements on the real property located at 2160 metropolitan parkway sw, atlanta, Georgia 30315 (collectively, the facility) for goodwill's use to conduct its charitable purpose. The facility enables goodwill to operate a career and job training center and a retail store. The company entered into an operating lease with goodwill pursuant to which, in addition to the construction, renovation , and installation of improvements, the company provides ongoing maintenance and management services related to the facility. In doing so, the company allows goodwill to dedicate additional time and resources to its core mission and charitable purpose. The company performs these services exclusively for goodwill, its designated publicly supported charitable organization. As a supporting organization within the meaning of section 509(a)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the code), net income of the company after allowance for maintenance and replacement reserves, if any , will ultimately be contributed to goodwill. The company funded the construction, renovation, and installation of the facility with a loan made possible by the new markets tax credit program within section 45d of the code and the efforts of a community development entity, aemi fund xxv, llc, a Georgia limited liability company, which allowed goodwill to maximize its positive impact. The company contributes excess funds contributed to or used in benefit of its activities, if any, to goodwill.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Missing
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -246.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.07; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 58.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $604K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.