GoodWeave International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522042014
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022349050
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Human Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,181,902
- Expenses
- $2,887,967
- Assets
- $3,094,800
- Liabilities
- $432,351
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jonathan Jacoby (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Jonathan Jacoby (CEO): $198,680 total reported compensation
- Hermon Puryear (Dir. of Business Engagemen): $144,953 total reported compensation
- Cyndi Janetzko (CFO): $139,738 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
GoodWeave works to stop child and forced labor in global supply chains. Permanently.
What it reported doing in 2025
Promote Best Practices: Advocacy, Research, and System's Change Partnerships: GoodWeave promotes best practices and builds capacity in other organizations based on its model. We also implement innovative projects, conduct research, and advance advocacy and thought leadership to expand impact across sectors. In February 2025, GoodWeave's published report, "Forced Labour and Child Labour in Bangladesh's Garment Sector: Documenting Risks and Informing Solutions", drew on on surveys and focus group discussions with more than 2,000 adult and minor workers across 20 industrial clusters in Dhaka and Chattogram, Bangladesh's key ready-made garment production hubs. GoodWeave provided concrete recommendations for the Government of Bangladesh, international buyers, local garment suppliers, non-governmental organizations, and trade unions to improve supply chain transparency, conduct risk-based human rights due diligence, ensure adequate compensation, mitigate child and forced labor, and establish effective grievance mechanisms in Bangladesh's ready-made garment sector.In October 2025, GoodWeave also releases its report, "From Risk to Resilience: How Climate Change is Deepening Child and Forced Labor in Nepal, and what to do about it," to document how climate change is intensifying risks for vulnerable groups and examines how workers and communities are coping with these pressures.The recommendations for public and private sector leaders, includes: designing and implementing targeted protec tions for climate-vulnerable children and adult workers in high-risk sectors by strengthening education, safeguarding, and climate awareness; strengthening agricultural resilience and land access while enhancing income-generating op portunities and livelihood diversification; enhancing climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction; and ex panding existing labor and social protection frameworks in Nepali law to ensure adequate safety of children.In 2025, GoodWeave continued to participate in numerous high-level events and advocacy platforms to promote the importance of ending child labor and modern slavery through deep due diligence practices that include full supply chain mapping, application of strong human rights standards, ensuring remedy to rights holders, and addressing root causes. These included speaking roles at the OECD Forum on Due Diligence in Apparel and Footwear, a stakeholder convening in Bangladesh, and an advocacy initiative to disseminate recommendations from the climate research in Nepal.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.