GoodLife Innovations
Legal name: Goodlife Innovations Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 384048144
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Lenexa, KS, US
- Phone
- (913) 225-8900
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,540,324
- Expenses
- $34,479,918
- Assets
- $16,694,423
- Liabilities
- $6,140,880
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL C STROUSE (CEO/PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN VOHLAND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL C STROUSE (CEO/PRESIDENT): $452,313 total reported compensation
- LAUREN VOHLAND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $207,105 total reported compensation
- STEPHAN FLOYD (CFO): $196,913 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help people live the GoodLife, surrounded by community, choice, and opportunity.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule ogoodlife university: goodlife university exists because "the way we've always done it" isn't good enough--we can do better.goodlife university was built out of the nearly half-century-long relationship between goodlife innovations and the university of Kansas department of applied behavioral science (ku-abs). In simplest terms, this partnership delivers a win-win to both organizations: goodlife benefits by receiving dedicated talent from ku-abs graduate students that conduct external quality assurance evaluations for goodlife's service models and programs, and ku-abs graduate students benefit by receiving direct, practicum experience with adults who have significant intellectual or developmental disabilities (i/dd). To this end, goodlife's partnership with ku-abs grants very affordable, immediate access to high-quality behavioral supports. However, the relationship goes much deeper than this thanks to our robust and intertwined history.from the moment goodlife was imagined, faculty and thought-leaders from ku-abs were included in the conversation to help answer the question, "what does a good life look like for individuals with i/dd?" institutions and facility-based care models were falling out of favor and the nation was looking for proven, community-based solutions. Ku-abs has a storied history, full of incredible talent and meaningful accomplishments. They are known for their work in creating models and services used nationally (e.g. Boys town) and for supporting more than 15k agencies nationwide that serve populations with challenging behaviors. Ku-abs also created and disseminated the community tool box, contributed to the creation of the sesame street curriculum, and founded the field's premier research journal, the journal of applied behavior analysis. Its alumni have held leadership roles in our nation's most prestigious behavioral programs, and were teachers, advisors, and mentors to many goodlife alum. Committed to the development of programs and services for adults with complex care needs, ku-abs faculty joined the families, guardians, and advocates of kansans with significant i/dd in a tremendous grassroots effort to improve the quality of care.now, nearly 50 years later, goodlife university is a thought-leading innovation engine that creates and delivers the next generation of best-practice community support for people who need effective, affordable help to live enriched, independent, and empowered lives of purpose. Goodlife university helps home and community-based service providers, states, and managed care organizations:1. Meaningfully improve the capacity, stability, and quality of our nation's direct support workforce. (this includes initiatives to improve dsp stability, training, support, pay, and benefits within currently budgeted resources.)2. Build and widely disseminate technology-leveraged service approaches that empower people to affordably receive the right support when and where needed to live their version of a good life. (this includes strategies for helping agencies migrate their service approaches to be leveraged by advanced technologies.)3. Create deep strategic provider, service, and funding partnerships that co-op and scale talent, increase and leverage resources, and focus this collective strategy and influence to advance goodlife's charitable mission.goodlife university's contributions include our workforce capacity solutions, education and training services, service model demonstrations (e.g. Neighborhood network and professional family [shared living]), behavioral services, and dissemination of ilink technologies.goodlife university produces video blogs, conducts and publishes applied research, and freely shares its impact/outcomes with community-based providers online and at regional and national conferences in order to inspire a culture of continuous improvement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 72.5%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 86.4%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 72.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $452K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.