Goodland Churches Thrift Shop Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753115155
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Goodland, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7858993022
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Thrift Shops
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,955
- Expenses
- $128,811
- Assets
- $123,345
- Liabilities
- $1,197
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUDY A MCKEE (PRESIDENT)
- PAT SCHIEFEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KAREN HOOKER (TREASURER)
- JUDY A MCKEE (PRESIDENT)
- PAT SCHIEFEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of the goodland churches thrift shop is to maintain a long term sustainable business in the community by safeguarding the mission of service with resources that provide a wide range of locally donated quality merchandise at affordable prices to benefit those in need.
What it reported doing in 2024
Donations to goodwill industries greater Nebraska goodland home school group moms and mentors 4-h shooting club group school supplies packets/low income families student college scholarship other multi-resource aid to local organization, school, churches, families, veterans, students, etc christmas food basket for fort hays technical college in the can food basket
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.9%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.9% of revenue deployed · 2.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.