Gooddogzorg Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200416698
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Reston, VA, USA
Phone
5712334557
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25
Expenses
$659
Assets
$6,921
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Beth Bates (President)
  • Heidi Weiss (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Beth Bates (President)
  • Heidi Weiss (Vice President)
  • Mark Bates (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

GoodDogz.org is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to educating potential dog owners on dog selection and care and supporting the efforts of local animal rescue groups. We organize multi-group animal welfare events and have helped over 600 dogs get adopted in 2019. We also provide online resources for owners of adopted dogs and rescue organizations.

What it reported doing in 2020

Pet Fiesta Local rescue groups are invited out to adopt out their animals to potential pet owners. During the event, GoodDogz.org provides entertainment and activities such as music, face painting and a balloon artist for those attending the event. It is estimated that over 400 dogs are adopted out as a result of this event. (Cancelled due to COVID-19 in 2020)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,536%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.5; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.