Gooddler Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810833072
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Daly City, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4155180204
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development - Business
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,593
- Expenses
- $139,047
- Assets
- $5,562
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Tatiana Fedorova (Secretary)
- Galina Fedorova (Chairman and Treasurer)
- Anna Dvornikova (Founding Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fostering youth entrepreneurship and leadership
What it reported doing in 2025
The Gooddler Arts and Culture Program, delivered through the Silicon Valley Music Competition, supports young musicians by expanding access to high-quality performance opportunities and preparing participants to navigate an evolving artistic landscape shaped by technology and AI. The program promotes artistic excellence alongside entrepreneurial and innovative thinking, helping students develop skills for sustainable careers in music and related creative fields. Through the competition, hundreds of young artists were reached, providing them with platforms for artistic growth, professional development, and creative leadership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.2%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $139K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.