Good Trouble Coalition Indiana Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920657494
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
8553168944
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,281
Expenses
$22,770
Assets
$53,574

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gabriel Bosslet MD (Past President)
  • Jane Hartsock JD (Vice President)
  • Mary Norine Walsh MD (President)

People named in this filing

  • Megan Carlson DrPH PPCNP-BC (Treasurer)
  • Gabriel Bosslet MD (Past President)
  • Jamie Levine Daniel MBA PhD (At-Large)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Good Trouble Coalition is a grassroots group of Hoosier healthcare and public health stakeholders who collaborate to educate, empower, and facilitate political advocacy to improve life in Indiana in the areas of patient-centered care, public health, and health equity. mission.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promote social welfare. This includes, but are not limited to: 1) educating and mobilizing denizens about health policy 2)facilitating political advocacy in the areas of patient-centered care, public health, and health equity, 3) training health professionals and public health experts on how to use their expertise to engage in the public policymaking process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 32
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.1%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 50.2%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 58.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.35; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 52.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 65.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 83.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.1% of revenue deployed · 50.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.