Good Shepherd Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410851905
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sauk Rapids, MN, United States
Phone
320.252.6525
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,723,073
Expenses
$26,939,308
Assets
$34,411,061
Liabilities
$30,411,654

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL STORDAHL (PRESIDENT/CEO/ADMINISTRATO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL STORDAHL (PRESIDENT/CEO/ADMINISTRATO): $223,565 total reported compensation
  • KRISTA MARTINI (CFO): $167,691 total reported compensation
  • JACQUELYN BARBER (DON/VP OF NURSING): $135,139 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Good Shepherd Foundation 2s mission is to support our aging community to live gracefully during their later years. Alzheimer’s Society’s Dementia Friends program is the biggest ever initiative to change people’s perceptions of dementia. It aims to transform the way the nation thinks, acts and talks about the condition. Dementia Friends is about learning more about dementia and the small ways you can help. From telling friends about the Dementia Friends program to visiting someone you know living with dementia, every action counts. Dementia Friends 2018 Challenge It’s a new year and Minnesota is now the Land of 10,000 Dementia Friends. What an accomplishment! How high can we go in 2018? If you attend an Information Session in your community or sign up for a Champions training and then present a Dementia F.

What it reported doing in 2024

Good shepherd assisted living: good shepherd assisted living is a package of services delivered to tenants in their own apartments, when the need arises. Assisted living includes health care, supportive services and personalized assistance designed to help residents age in place and maintain their independence for as long as possible. The base package of assisted living services includes, 24-hour awake on-site supervision, emergency response system, weekly housekeeping and laundry services, assistance with setting up medical transportation, and life enrichment activities. Good shepherd assisted living allows tenants living in one of the four sauk rapids apartment buildings to continue to live in their apartment after the need for additional services arise. Tenants are not required to move to a separate assisted living building. The majority of the clients receive funding from the medical assistance program.shepherd court apartments: shepherd court apartments is a one-story 53 unit market rate apartment complex for the purpose of providing older and handicapped adults with housing facilities. Constructed in 1985, shepherd court apartments has six floor plans of one and two bedroom units, surrounding an open courtyard in the center of the building. It includes its own security system. Services are designed to meet tenants' physical, social and psychological needs and to promote their health, security, and happiness in longer living through a christian perspective. Shepherd court apartments is a part of a 30 acre senior living campus in sauk rapids, Minnesota which includes skilled nursing facility care, sub-acute/short term rehabilitation services, congregate dining, skilled home care services, assisted living services, memory care services, and independent living apartments. All the buildings are connected through enclosed links allowing tenants to freely move between buildings to meet friends or enjoy a walk inside avoiding harsh Minnesota winter conditions. If a tenant of shepherd court apartments need services beyond housing, such as meals, home care, or assisted living, those services are met by good shepherd lutheran home of sauk rapids, Minnesota staff in the tenant apartment. This allows the tenant to remain in their home for as long as possible. Independent tenants are welcomed to join any activity program offered to the tenants with assisted living services. Exercise program, pokeno, card clubs, bingo, movie night, quilting bee, outside music groups, outside speakers to discuss areas of concerns such as scams and medicare question & answer, reminiscing times, and red hat society are just a few of the activities that occur at shepherd court apartments. Shepherd court apartments also employs a social service coordinator to assist tenants with their psychosocial needs. Tenants can meet with the social service coordinator to discuss services that are needed, such as assistance with paying of bills, and various other services. The apartment manager is onsite 20 hours per week to assist tenants with services as well.good shepherd home health: good shepherd home health care provides health care and homemaking services to older adults in the comfort and privacy of their own home, within a 30-mile services area of the sauk rapids campus. Home health care helps individuals regain independence following an illness or injury, hospitalization or a nursing home stay through services such as skilled nursing, rehabilitation, iv therapy, medication teaching and set-up, and home health aide services. Outreach development: good shepherd outreach development provides management services to the divisions of the organization. Nutritional services to the apartment tenants are a service of the outreach services division. Some of the tenants of the four sauk rapids apartments prefer not to cook or prefer to eat in a more social setting. Several dining areas serve the culinary needs of the apartment tenants. Optional meal plans are available to

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $23.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $224K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.6M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.