Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
470659443
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
3088652700
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,817,950
Expenses
$644,107
Assets
$17,116,283
Liabilities
$2,486,517

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CURT COLEMAN (PRESIDENT GSH)
  • CINDI RICHTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CURT COLEMAN (PRESIDENT GSH): $423,130 total reported compensation
  • NICK O'TOOL (MARKET CFO): $346,543 total reported compensation
  • KATHY BERTOLINI (VP PHILANTHROPY): $331,625 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

I. Mission - good samaritan hospital foundation supports the health care services, research and education mission of good samaritan hospital. The foundation seeks, receives and administers donations for the benefit of the entire health system. Our fundraising activities and careful stewardship of resources make possible the programs that help further our organizational mission of serving patients, families and our community. Ii. Vision - honoring our catholic heritage, good samaritan health systems is recognized for excellence in regional healthcare through values-based leadership. Iii. Primary tax-exempt purpose - the primary exempt purpose of good samaritan hospital foundation is to support the charitable mission of good samaritan hospital through solicitation and receipt of contributions, gifts, grants, devises or bequests.

What it reported doing in 2024

Good samaritan hospital, through its foundation and various programs, has taken a leadership role in providing a vehicle for the community at large and employees within the system to donate funds that will serve the needy and a variety of community groups and organizations. Examples of these initiatives include: cancer fund - good samaritan hospital employees and the area community donate to the cancer fund to help defray the cost of travel for cancer patients traveling outside the kearney area for treatment.cancer assistance fund - this fund was started as an annual campaign by kearney high school's tackle cancer drive. The money raised has been donated to good samaritan cancer center to provide financial assistance to patients seeking treatment here. Family assistance fund - in order to help patients and their families with necessities such as meals, housing and transportation during a patient's stay, good samaritan has this fund to provide limited assistance.good samaritan fund - this fund provides emergency funds and relief to employees and their families in need. Margaret mitchell palmer home health endowment fund - this is a fund established to provide home health services to those unable to afford such services. Ron and carol cope endowed elder health care fund - this is a fund established to assist elder citizens in gaining access to needed health care services. Several patients and their families are assisted through the cope fund. Scholarship funds - a variety of scholarship funds have been established to provide monetary support for students pursuing careers in health professions. In 2024, the good samaritan hospital foundation awarded $19,750 in scholarships to 19 qualified recipients through good samaritan hospital. Shirley chavanu endowed nursing scholarship fund shirley chavanu was an oncology nurse at good samaritan hospital from 1977 to 1999. Shirley, her family, and friends have made possible this annual scholarship for an individual pursuing a career in nursing.ron and carol cope endowed healthcare scholarship fund - this fund was established in 2015 to provide scholarships for students pursuing a career in a healthcare field. Preference is given to chi health good samaritan employees.jim and marcia elder family endowed radiology scholarship fund - family and friends of jim elder, former good samaritan radiology employee, have established this scholarship to benefit individuals pursuing a career in radiology. A scholarship will be awarded to a senior radiology student attending unmc-kearney and completing their rotation at good samaritan.bernard haag endowed nursing scholarship fund - this endowed fund was established in memory of bernard haag to benefit individuals pursuing a career in nursing. Harms' family endowed scholarship fund - george, former vice president of finance at good samaritan, and jana harms established this fund in 2008. This scholarship will benefit those students pursuing a healthcare career.hiram and suz walker endowed medical scholarship fund - this endowed fund was established in 1997 by dr. And mrs. H.r. Walker. The late dr. Walker was a member of the good samaritan hospital medical staff for 37 years and served as vice president of medical affairs at good samaritan hospital for eight years. The walkers' generous gift will assist in providing medical scholarships in the years to come.leroy e. Rheault endowed scholarship fund - leroy e. Rheault was president of good samaritan from 1981 - 1988. In appreciation of leroy, his colleagues, associates and friends established an endowed scholarship bearing his name.don and delores williams endowed scholarship fund the late don williams was a former employee of good samaritan hospital. In 1992, he and his wife, delores, created this endowed scholarship. This fund makes possible an annual scholarship for a student pursuing a healthcare career.richard young behavioral health center fund - gifts donated to richard young help in securing safe tra

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.2%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,059.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 82.4%; rating input score 82; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 77.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.57; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.2% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $572K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $423K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 329 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.