Good Samaritan Health Services
Legal name: Good Samaritan Health Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731559561
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 918-710-4222
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,764,052
- Expenses
- $2,836,403
- Assets
- $719,121
- Liabilities
- $66,354
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MITCHELL DUININCK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR MITCHELL DUININCK (PRESIDENT): $12,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide free medical care to the uninsured and underserved in the Tulsa community.
What it reported doing in 2025
We provide other specific programs designed to meet the needs of the population we serve. In 2025, we held 56 women's healthcare clinics providing care for 467 women. We provide pap smears, breast exams, and free mammogram coupons. We help with diagnostic co-pays, deductible assistance, transportation, and interpreter services. We have 3 eye clinics using volunteer optometrists. All of our over 600 diabetic patients receive retinal scans for diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of blindness in diabetics. We partner with a local retinal specialist provider when a patient needs treatment for retinopathy. We pay the cost of the medications needed for injections and surgery and the specialist provider donates his services. The people who benefit from our services are the underserved and uninsured individuals from the greater tulsa area and surrounding counties. We were able to help people from 11 different countries and prevent over 657 emergency room visits to our local hospitals. In 2025 63% of our patients were female and 37% were male. The average age was 49 years old. The demographic breakdown of patients by race was 11.2% caucasian, 64.8% mexican/hispanic, 3.5% african american, 4.1% asian, 14% other which includes middle eastern.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.4%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $39.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 93.4% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $13K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.