Good Samaritan Health Services Foundation of Lebanon Pa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232356151
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- York, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172707864
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $637,158
- Expenses
- $601,183
- Assets
- $5,322,655
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROXANNA GAPSTUR PHD RN (PRESIDENT & CEO - WELLSPAN HEALTH)
Highest reported compensation
- ROXANNA GAPSTUR PHD RN (PRESIDENT & CEO - WELLSPAN HEALTH): $3,176,598 total reported compensation
- LAURA BUCZKOWSKI (EXECUTIVE VP & CFO - WELLSPAN HEALTH): $1,408,553 total reported compensation
- TYLER FUGATE DO (DIRECTOR): $779,784 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the foundation is to support the program and equipment needs of the good samaritan health system, the good samaritan hospital of lebanon Pennsylvania and its tax-exempt corporation entities, in accordance with their missions.
What it reported doing in 2024
All donations made to good samaritan hospital foundation will be used to support wellspan good samaritan hospital and its endeavors in lebanon county.good samaritan health services foundation designates money raised to the following funds: building access, restoring hope - help improve access to behavioral healthcare in the lancaster community.where needed most -help us respond to emerging needs. Giving to this fund enables us to address the areas of greatest need for wellspan health.cancer patient comfort fund - help provide services, equipment and amenities that are not covered by insurance but go a long way toward making patients feel more comfortable during treatment.cancer patient help fund - lend a hand to patients facing the financial burdens that often result from dealing with the impact of cancer. This fund helps with basic living expenses, such as rent, utilities, groceries and transportation to and from medical appointments. Funds are available to patients who meet specific financial aid guidelines.wellspan good samaritan patient support fund - help patients who have needs that affect their treatment or health outcomes. This fund assists at-risk patients with food, transportation, transitional housing and life-saving medications.wellspan good samaritan future physician scholarship program - help fund this unique wellspan initiative to sponsor medical school scholarships. Scholarships aid young people with a connection to a local wellspan community and require them to return to work within the wellspan footprint following their graduation.wellspan good samaritan heart and vascular gratitude program fund - help ensure immediate care for cardiovascular emergencies. A cardiac event often requires immediate attention. During these situations, having easily accessible, advanced care close to home is essential. Wellspan is proud to offer that to your community, but that would not be possible without your generous support.spotlight on children's health - invest in children's early development to eliminate health and achievement inequities later in life by providing literacy and early childhood education services and meeting special health care needs. This fund supports the opportunity for all children in our regions of care to develop in safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments.see wellspan health - 2025 community benefit report located at https://www.wellspan.org/about-wellspan/improving-healthy-communities/community-benefit.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.85; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.8% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $467K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.2M · 17 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 50 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.