Good Neighbors USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203644749
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Tustin, CA, USA
Phone
8774999898
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,202,814
Expenses
$13,236,757
Assets
$2,845,607
Liabilities
$170,864

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • IL HA YI (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MINA CHOI (SECRETARY): $40,735 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Good neighbors USA is an international humanitarian and development organization committed to build a global community where people live together in health, harmony, and dignity.

What it reported doing in 2025

Women & children shelter in 2025, the good neighbors la domestic shelter successfully enrolled a total of 61 clients, including 48 adults and 13 children, providing a safe and supportive environment for women and children in crisis. The program provided a comprehensive range of individualized, client-centered case management services tailored to meet the unique needs of each household. Services included assistance in securing emergency, temporary, and transitional housing; access to medical and mental health care services; legal advocacy support, including assistance with restraining orders and obtaining identification documents; transportation assistance and client incentives; as well as ongoing housing navigation aimed at promoting long- term stability and self-sufficiency. Education gnu's education program advocates for every child's right to quality and equitable education, with a focus on increasing enrollment and retention among girls and marginalized groups. In 2025, gnu supported children with disabilities in nepal through an inclusive education project addressing infrastructure gaps, social stigma, and access barriers. Gnu also facilitated the distribution of 8,100 solar led lights in el salvador, enabling children in underserved communities to continue studying after dark. Water & sanitation gnu's water and sanitation program provides access to clean water and safe living environments through community infrastructure and hygiene education. In 2025, gnu delivered 1,224,000 water purification tablets to zambia and launched a new wash project in nicaragua serving 96 rural communities where 43% of residents lack access to safe water. Using a gender-responsive approach, the project targets a 70% reduction in diarrheal diseases among children under 15 and works to increase female leadership in community water management. Income generation gnu's income generation program strengthens economic capacities of individuals and communities through vocational training, business development support, and access to initial capital. In 2025, gnu supported at-risk adolescents in guatemala-particularly indigenous girls facing school dropout-through certified vocational training in sectors such as agriculture, mechanics, and beauty services, integrated with entrepreneurship and digital skills development. In el salvador, a u.s. Embassy-funded vocational program trained 30 youth in automotive mechanics and beauty services, with all participants successfully completing the program and receiving toolkits to begin immediate income generation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.