Good Neighbors Ems Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853991747
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Little Falls, MN, USA
- Phone
- 3206302599
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Search and Rescue Squads
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,612
- Expenses
- $63,159
- Assets
- $21,047
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARK MOE (President)
- PATRICK BOONE (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- DR MARK MOE (President)
- PATRICK BOONE (Vice President)
- STACY MACIEJ (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide volunteer ems, fire and rescue, and law enforcement agencies in morrison county, Minnesota access to life savings aeds and medical equipment bags when dispatched by 9-1-1 centers.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the year the organization provided 8 medical equipment bags to morrison county ems agencies include: 1st responder teams - scandia valley andswanville, and law enforcement - morrison county sheriff deputies. From prior year's designated donation the organization provided an additional 67 bags to ems and law enforcement agencies in cass, crow wing, todd and wadena counties. Since the organizations year of formation (2020) they have provided 34 zoll aeds and 184 bags to morrison county agencies. Additionally, they have provided additional 60 aed units and 536 medical equipment bags in cass, crow wing, morrison, todd and wadena counties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -495.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -60% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.