Good Neighbor House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311374154
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9372243442
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,070,931
- Expenses
- $3,767,502
- Assets
- $4,851,588
- Liabilities
- $69,893
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE COLLIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE COLLIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $126,422 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Good neighbor house is a nonprofit, faith-based, human development organization that provides health, nutrition, and education services to the underserved through relationships with relevant collaborative service partners.
What it reported doing in 2024
Human services: in 2024, good neighbor house provided essential resources for over 71,590 individuals and families through human services programs such as nutritional services and household items.distributed 14,428,620 items of foodheld 48 lectures covering wellness topics to 729 participants386 active human service volunteers & groups donated 7,632 hours of their timehealthcare services: as one of the few providers of low cost dental, medical, eye, and dietary services in the area, gnh was instrumental in improving the health of many who would otherwise not be able to afford needed healthcare. Gnh provided quality affordable (little to no cost) health care visits to uninsured and underserved families throughout the miami valley region.provided 250 counseling sessionsprovided 2707 medical and general care examsduring 2024, gnh accepted care source, molina and buckeye insurances for its dental patients, providing a total of 21,209 quality care dental visits at low and affordable costsprovided 41 visits with optometrists and distributed free glasses vouchersprovided 3,664 prescriptionsprovided 38 visits with podiatristsprovided 120 physical therapist visitsprovided 223 visits with registered dietitians through the special dietary needs pantry272 healthcare professionals donated over 1,600 hours of quality care and time to help meet the growing healthcare needs of uninsured neighbors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $41.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.