Golf Charities Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462580975
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Lake Oswego, OR, USA
Phone
5034126713
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,927
Expenses
$144,927
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFF SANDERS (President)

People named in this filing

  • JEFF SANDERS (President)
  • BRENT BREWER (SECRETARY/TREAS)
  • PAUL WITTMAN (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Gcf was formed to make donations to charitable organizations primarily from funds raised hosting two professional golf tournaments. Gcf has contracts with pga tour, inc. To host a tournament on the pga's web.com tour and a tournament on the regular pga tour. In turn gcf has contracted with lagardere sports and entertainment to conduct the tournaments, including all operations, obtaining corporate sponsors to underwrite the costs of the tournaments, selling tickets, and making arrangements with the professional golf association/web.com tour.

What it reported doing in 2021

During 2021, golf charities foundation inc. Raised funds of $144,927 from the 2020 golf tournaments. In turn, after expenses of $7,664, $137,263 was donated to various charities in the geographical area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.3%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.3% of revenue deployed · 5.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.