Golden Sands Resource Conservation and Development Council Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391451323
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Stevens Point, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7153436215
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,524,987
- Expenses
- $1,787,872
- Assets
- $465,357
- Liabilities
- $128,160
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ED HERNANDEZ (PRESIDENT (THROUGH JANUARY))
- SHANE WUCHERPFENNIG (PRESIDENT (BEG. FEBRUARY))
- BILL LEICHTNAM (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER GLAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER GLAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $73,664 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of golden sands resource conservation and development council incorporated is to manage natural and human resources in ways consistent with sound conservation principles by working across county lines to address local concerns.
What it reported doing in 2024
For over 50 years, we have partnered with countless volunteers, agencies, and organizations to make central Wisconsin a better place to work and live by promoting clean water, healthy forests, abundant wildlife, and sustainable agriculture.clean water - our clean boats, clean waters program assisted lakes in central Wisconsin with hiring and training summer watercraft inspectors. Summer staff were hired to talk with boaters at boat landings about the importance of removing plants and draining all water to prevent the spread of invasive species. Our efforts helped boaters recognize that they play a big role in keeping our lakes beautiful! Healthy forests - in 2024, we continued to expand our demonstration forest project. The demonstration forests act as living classrooms and sites for educational workshops, where community members and private landowners can learn about forest management and resources available to help them manage their property. In 2024, we hosted 3 demonstration forest events located at the marathon county demo forest, portage county demo forest and one at the monroe county demo forest. Abundant wildlife - we partnered with the u.s. Fish & wildlife service on a national fish and wildlife foundation monarch program that covers 54 counties in southern Wisconsin. The focal species of this program are the monarch butterfly, rusty patch bumblebee, and the karner blue butterfly. Through this partnership, our habitat restoration technician works with private landowners across the state to restore and enhance 1,000 acres of pollinator habitat over 2 years.sustainable agriculture - our nonprofit organization continued to lead in supporting the united states department of agriculture natural resources conservation service (usda-nrcs), in Wisconsin, by co-employing affiliate staff throughout central and southwest Wisconsin. These employees boosted the capacity of the local offices by taking on a variety of tasks such as: entering applications for conservation programs, writing conservation plans, and documenting completed conservation projects. In 2024 we also expanded our grazing work through building the buzz about grazing in central Wisconsin program. This program helps us reach new audiences and better serve producers needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.5%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $37.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.5% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 29 of 29 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 35 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.