Golden Rule Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680476030
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164274653
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $521,236
- Expenses
- $417,880
- Assets
- $203,348
- Liabilities
- $36,990
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James Douglas (President)
- George Fisher (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Matthew Burlingame-Couk (Secretary): $8,064 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To resolve health, education, employment and criminal justice disparities with Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) communities through the provision of culturally competent programs and resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
Golden Rule Services Program Accomplishments FY2023-2024: Quarter One: GRS entered a $0 MOU contract with Sacramento County to obtain tests/supplies and cover the lab fees associated with any tests. Golden Rule Services (GRS) was awarded the Black/African American and Latinx HIV/HCV Testing contract (1/31/23) Obtained our CLIA renewals for GRS office and the mobile testing unit GRS updated its HIV Quality Assurance Plan GRS obtained In-kind office supplies from Sacramento County GRS staff attended the following trainings: The National STD curriculum (1/12/23), Status Neutral Training (1/20/23), OA stakeholder QAPLC (1/23/23), Chexout training (2/2/23), Applying HIV assist training (2/15/23), PrEP Uptake (2/13/23), HIV Medication Therapy Management (2/21/23), HIV is Not a Crime webinar (2/28/23), PrEP on Demand (3/14/23) and STI Clinical Update webinar (3/28/23 GRS conducted 16 testing outreach events (13 Sac Buddies, 1 Poly Studio, 1 Bolt, 1 Asparinet) One hundred and five (105) clients have obtained rapid HIV testing this quarter. Sixteen tested for the first time. One hundred and three (103) clients have obtained 3-site STD testing. Seven clients testing reactive for STD (4 reactive for chlamydia and 3 reactive for gonorrhea) and were referred for treatment. Seventy-five clients obtained a rapid HCV test. The GRS website recorded 1,043 unique views. One hundred and five clients obtained PrEP education. Quarter Two: Completed annual audit early Completed Sacramento County Administrative Site Visit Conducted a World AIDS Day press conference and received a California Legislative Assembly Resolution Attended capacity building meetings with Gilead Pharmaceutical to explore clinic expansion Attended Sacramento County Racial Equity Summit Mr. Sullivan is now a member of the HIV Health Services Planning Council GRS is now a member of the Sacramento Black Chamber of Commerce, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and Rainbow Chamber of Commerce Thirteen (13) clients have obtained rapid HIV testing this quarter. Eleven (11) of these clients also tested for STI (85%). Of those tested, 9 identified as People of Color (69%), 2 identified as men who have sex with men (MSM) (15%), and 1 identified as MSM of Color (8%). Three clients tested for the first time. Thirteen (13) obtained 3-site STI testing. Eleven (11) of these clients also tested for HIV l (85%). Of the 8 identified as People of Color (69%), 3 identified as MSM (23%), and 1 identified as MSM of Color (8%). One client testing reactive for STI (chlamydia) and was referred to treatment. Four (4) clients obtained a rapid HCV test. Of those, 3 identified as People of Color (75%), 2 identified as MSM, and 2 identified as MSM of Color (50%) The GRS website recorded 12,907 pages viewed and 1,732 were unique viewers. Although only 1% of the 2,345 unique viewers visited our HIV testing appointment page, PrEP Navigation page, and STI testing page, Seventy-six percent (76%) viewed our website on desktops, 23% on mobile devices, and 1% on tablets. GRS appeared in over 285 Google searches. Of those searches, 166 asked for directions to GRS and 71 called the office. Thirteen clients obtained PrEP education. Nine clients were referred to Sacramento County Sexual Health Clinic for PrEP. Quarter Three Obtained mandatory Cyber Insurance Policy Renewal Golden Rule Services received the prestigious 2024 Legacy in Excellence award from the 36th Annual Sacramento Black History Month Expo Golden Rule Services received the prestigious 2024 Business in Excellence award from the Sacramento Rainbow Chamber of Commerce Attended capacity building meetings to explore clinic expansion Twenty-two (22) clients have obtained rapid HIV testing this quarter. Twenty (20) of these clients also tested for STI (90%). Of those tested, 20 identified as People of Color (90%), 14 identified as men who have sex with men (MSM) (64%), and 10 identified as MSM of Color (45%). One clients tested for the first time. Twenty-three (23) c
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $355K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.