Golden Retriever Reproduction Bank Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881283687
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Custer, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7154984618
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,616
- Expenses
- $2,489
- Assets
- $48,127
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUE SCHWARZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUE SCHWARZ (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA MCLEAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- LINDA WILLARD (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission and purpose of the golden retriever reproduction bank, inc. Is to provide educational resources and scientific research related to safeguarding the viability, continued existence and genetic diversity of the golden retriever canine breed, by way of collection, storage and distribution of reproductive material from golden retrievers to other golden retriever breeders. The organization is authorized to form partnerships with university and research facilities on the continuation and genetic diversity of the breed will be shared as the reproduction bank functions to provide a source of reproductive material for breeders in the future in furtherance of its purpose.
What it reported doing in 2022
2022 accomplishments: set-up organization (incorporation, development of internal forms, designation of officers, worked on logo, mission statement, outline of future website, discussions of storage facilities and gathering information, application for EIN and tax-exempt status), applied for financial support from golden retriever club of america, inc. 2023 goals: obtain IRS determination letter, advertisement of mission, arrange for storage of future donations, website goes live.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.8%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.34; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.8% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.