Golden Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453515527
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Silver Spring, MD, USA
Phone
3017321773
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Judaism
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,319
Expenses
$111,672
Assets
$65,296
Liabilities
$9,131

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tuvia Leigh (President)
  • Marc Nelkin (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rabbi Shmuel Leigh (Secretary)
  • Tuvia Leigh (President)
  • Marc Nelkin (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Since 2011, The Golden Network TGN has provided a caring network of people helping retirees and seniors find their way in the journey of life. Jewish senior citizens are perhaps the most overlooked and under-supported demographic in the Jewish community today. Recognizing the largely unaddressed needs of this important population, TGN was founded to provide friendship, education, and connection to retirees and seniors. Since its inception, TGN has grown successfully and has been able to have a profound impact on the lives of an ever-widening circle of senior citizens. TGN offers a wide range of programs, including inspirational lectures, classes, musical performances, one-on-one Torah study, and caregiver support.

What it reported doing in 2025

Senior Programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.