San Antonio Jewish Senior Services

Legal name: Golden Manor Inc Dba San Antonio Jewish Senior Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
746061449
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Antonio, TX, United States
Phone
210-616-4811
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$831,571
Expenses
$502,918
Assets
$3,462,347
Liabilities
$81,628

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STACEY KLINE SCHWARTZ (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • STACEY KLINE SCHWARTZ (CEO): $149,388 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

San Antonio Jewish Senior Services (SAJSS) provides services and programming for Jewish seniors through transportation, social, cultural, and educational programming, grants and funding, and an information and referral service. In keeping with Jewish tradition and an abiding commitment to our community, we wish to share our legacy with others. By supporting SAJSS through a Life & Legacy gift, you help ensure that future generations of Jewish older adults in San Antonio receive the care, connection, and support they deserve. Your commitment today creates a lasting impact, strengthening our shared values and sustaining vital programs for years to come. If you have not already made a Life & Legacy commitment to SAJSS, please complete the Letter of Intent below to make SAJSS part of your enduring legacy. If you have made a legacy commitment to SAJSS, but have not yet formalized it...

What it reported doing in 2024

1. Provide and coordinate religious, cultural, and social activities to foster the connection between older adults and the broader jewish community.2. Provide transportation for older adults in the jewish community to healthcare appointments, religious services, social, educational, and cultural programs, and other activities in the jewish community.3. Partner with other local jewish organizations on older adult programming and support.4. Provide an information and referral program for older adults, their families and caregivers.5. Coordinate religious, social, cultural and educational activities for older adults in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.88; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $393K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $149K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.