Golden Age Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510183604
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Weaverville, CA, USA
Phone
5306232324
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Meals on Wheels

Reported finances

Revenue
$187,353
Expenses
$115,738
Assets
$312,987
Liabilities
$161,114

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID ALBIEZ (President)
  • EVERETT HARVEY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • LYNN MCELROY (Treasurer)
  • DAVID ALBIEZ (President)
  • JANE DRAPER (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Meals served at the center delivered to home bound person. Information and assistance contacts- both by phone and in person. Persons transportedf or meals, medical appointments, shopping etc.

What it reported doing in 2020

The organizations purpose is to serve meals at the center and to deliver to homebound persons. The center also provides information and assistance contacts, medical appointments, shopping, etc

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.8%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.2%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.7; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.