Goldburg Family Foundation Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933175790
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6468421127
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,863
- Expenses
- $56,614
- Assets
- $70,988
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT GOLDBURG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT GOLDBURG (PRESIDENT)
- JACK GOLDBURG (SECRETARY)
- ALEXANDRA GOLDBURG (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goldburg family foundation corporation ("gff") is organized and based in New York. Gff is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. Gff's mission is to combat food insecurity and expand access to education throughout New York city through community-based food programs, scholarships, and partnerships.
What it reported doing in 2025
The goldburg family foundation corporation ("gff") accomplished two core initiatives during 2025. It awarded two scholarships that open doors for underserved students. Through goldburg family pantry, it provided nourishing food to neighbors in need. Together, these programs bridge the gap between ambition and opportunity, starting in our own backyard.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.7%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 39.6%; rating input score 40
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 77.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 73.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.7% of revenue deployed · 39.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.