Gold Camp Housing Partners

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993676667
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cripple Creek, CO, USA
Phone
7193510193
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,107
Expenses
$152,769
Assets
$186,814
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN BALCOME (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PETER BARRETT (PRESIDENT)
  • TRAVIS PHILLIPS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHANON CONLEY (PRESIDENT (TERM END 8/1/25))

People named in this filing

  • SUSAN BALCOME (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PETER BARRETT (PRESIDENT)
  • TRAVIS PHILLIPS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Attract developers to bring housing options to communities in southern teller county, create rental and homeownership housing opportunities for families and seniors, and workforce housing for households under 120% ami in southern teller county and surrounding areas.

What it reported doing in 2025

Gold camp housing partners ('gchp') plans to provide a minimum of 13 affordable single-family homes in compliance with Colorado's proposition 123 affordable housing program. Projects will include single-family and multi-family homes for sale and for rent to local qualifying residents. This will include new construction, existing property renovation, and personal residence enhancement through accessory dwelling units (adu). 540 homes need to be built in 5 years per the 2019 cripple creek victor needs analysis. We lack rentals at the affordable 50% area median income and lack affordable single-family homes at the less than 100% area median income. There is a high demand for government funding to get the assistance necessary for small cities to move forward. Many of the affordable lots in the city don't have access to water, sewer, electric, and gas. They are also in flood plains that can't get funding. Gchp plans to utilize government programs to reduce construction interest rates and terms. Gchp has already made noticeable progress, and we're motivated and excited to achieve and exceed our objective going forward.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 92%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,411.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 58.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -188.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -55.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $141K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.