Going Global Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260340242
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Phone
- 7655893689
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $693,251
- Expenses
- $665,966
- Assets
- $302,729
- Liabilities
- $7,927
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOB GUSTAFSON (PRESIDENT)
- ROBIN NONNEMACHER (VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- DENNIS NONNEMACHER (TREASURER): $76,046 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Teach christian, biblical principles, mobilizing christian churches worldwide for religious and humanitarian outreach. Provide food, clothing, education for orphans, widows, pastors in remote areas.
What it reported doing in 2025
We fed, clothed and educated orphans and street children in se asia and indian, andaman islands of india. We provided education for slum children in nepal by supporting 9 slumschools. We fed, provided clean water, and clothed street kids, slum kids and widows in poor neighborhoods. We conducted training for pastors, leaders and childrens workers through zoom conferences in kenya, myanmar, belize, vietnam, india. We provided humanitarian aid in israel. Through grants and assistance ggi provided aid for over 9000 people, mainly poor children, widows and orphans. We conduct monthly prayer meetings on zoom for international pastors, leaders and those interested in our work.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.4%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 46.2%; rating input score 46; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.4% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $633K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.