God's House Baptist Ministry

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861109445
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2020
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Roanoke, VA, USA
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$294,262
Expenses
$200,052
Assets
$1,088,212
Liabilities
$249,209

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR FLOYD DAVIS (FOUNDER/CEO)
  • DEACONESS TOMEKA AKERSON (PRESIDENT-DE)

People named in this filing

  • DR FLOYD DAVIS (FOUNDER/CEO)
  • DEACON JEFFERY AKERSON (CHAIRMAN-DEA)
  • DEACONESS TOMEKA AKERSON (PRESIDENT-DE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

God's house baptist mimistry is to spread the gospel of jesus christ throughout the world by proclamation and example.

What it reported doing in 2020

God's house baptist mimistry (ghbm) is to spread the gospel of jesus christ throughout the world by proclamation and example. Started our initial housing program for ex-offenders. Ghbm, in order to help ex-offenders re-enter the community and workforce, offered low rent apartments for to help these gentlemen transition easier. Our apartment houses up to 6 men.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.44; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 43.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $196K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.