Go Team Therapy Crisis and Airport Dogs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824541123
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
8635468326
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Training, Behavior

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$136,434
Expenses
$145,309
Assets
$89,954
Liabilities
$4,746

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY TREPAGNIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MERCEDES ROWLAND (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY WIRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NANCY TREPAGNIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MERCEDES ROWLAND (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY WIRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rigorous training of dogs and their owners. Interact with people in a variety of settings. Assist trained crisis/mental health workers in providing comfort to those in crisis situations. Provide etiquette training for service/emotional support dogs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Training and general program: the go team therapy, crisis, and airport dogs, inc is a program of therapy dogs and their handlers that volunteer to provide comfort and care through a canine-human bond. Volunteers serve a wide variety of settings, including assisted living homes, libraries, schools, and hospitals. As well as provide help to victims in distress and work with our servicemen, first responders, and anywhere a therapy/comfort dog is needed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.5%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 44.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.5% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.