Go Run Missoula
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922605071
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Missoula, MT, USA
- Phone
- 5126278375
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $271,710
- Expenses
- $201,051
- Assets
- $284,645
- Liabilities
- $11,877
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELA BRIDEGAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- RAYNEE DAGUERRE (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA BRIDEGAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,606 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Go run missoula cultivates leadership skills and fosters an appreciation for physical activity in female and non-binary youth in western Montana through running and education
What it reported doing in 2025
Go run missoula (grm) offers non-competitive running and leadership development programs for youth, with a specific focus on girls and non-binary youth, in grades 38 across western Montana. Through three seasonal after-school sessions each year, participants engage in trail and road running, running games, strength and conditioning, yoga and mindfulness, and structured life-skills and leadership workshops. Grms curriculum is designed to build confidence, resilience, healthy habits, and strong peer/mentor connections by prioritizing social-emotional growth, self-awareness, self-management, and positive youth development over competition and winning. Grm expands access by offering scholarships and partnering with local schools and community organizations to reduce financial barriers for families. Grm also mobilizes trained volunteers and seasonal coaches to deliver programming at multiple sites, creating safe, empowering spaces where youth can strengthen physical fitness, practice leadership, and develop lasting community support networks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 45.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.9% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.