Go and Do Likewise Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270152204
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Fountain Valley, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7142649187
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,851
- Expenses
- $2,727
- Assets
- $9,224
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREN GAMES (PRESIDENT)
- TRACEY BRONSON (CEO)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN SCHWARZ (BOOKKEPPER)
- KAREN GAMES (PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN GAMES (VP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Go and Do Likewise exists to empower individuals to serve others through volunteerism, compassion, and hands-on service opportunities, both locally and globally.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the 2025 fiscal year, Go and Do Likewise focused on building foundational programs, redesigning mission and expanding access to volunteer opportunities. With the support of generous donors, the organization: Provided financial assistance to five individuals to participate in their first volunteer service journey, removing financial barriers and enabling meaningful community engagement. Successfully launched the organization's official website, creating a central platform to communicate the mission, recruit volunteers, and share impact stories. Continued to develop infrastructure and redesign to include volunteer opportunities both National and International to support future volunteer initiatives and program growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.38; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -39.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.